{"id":2069,"date":"2024-05-08T15:15:12","date_gmt":"2024-05-08T14:15:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/boardgamewire.com\/?p=2069"},"modified":"2024-05-08T18:21:12","modified_gmt":"2024-05-08T17:21:12","slug":"kickstarter-tells-wonders-of-the-first-team-to-cancel-controversial-1-4m-campaign-over-nft-use","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/boardgamewire.com\/index.php\/2024\/05\/08\/kickstarter-tells-wonders-of-the-first-team-to-cancel-controversial-1-4m-campaign-over-nft-use\/","title":{"rendered":"Kickstarter tells Wonders of the First team to cancel controversial $1.4m campaign over NFT use"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Wonders of the First, a contentious collectible card game project which has <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kickstarter.com\/projects\/wondersccg\/wonders-of-the-first-ccg\">raised more than $1.4m since launching on Kickstarter last week<\/a>, has been told by the crowdfunding platform to pull the campaign for its inclusion of cards which can be redeemed for NFTs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kickstarter confirmed to BoardGame Wire that it has given Wonders of the First 48 hours to voluntarily cancel the project, or the crowdfunding site will suspend the campaign itself, saying the NFT-related rewards violate the platform&#8217;s rules. A spokesperson added that &#8220;The creator is allowed to relaunch the project without NFTs&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Wonders of the First had already attracted criticism for its widespread use of AI art throughout the project, while there has also been scepticism over how the relatively unknown company managed to reach $1m within 24 hours of the project&#8217;s launch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>More than $400,000 was quickly pledged to the project by around 50 backers of its top-tier &#8220;Supernova&#8221; reward level, each parting with over $8,000 &#8211; leading to suggestions the project had been inundated with speculators.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Over 2,200 backers have now pledged about $1.46m to the project, mostly at the $195 tier &#8211; although those orders will all be cancelled if the campaign is pulled from Kickstarter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Project lead Jeff French, who previously created NFT-based digital collectible trading card company Blokpax, posted on the game&#8217;s offical discord yesterday to tell backers about the Kickstarter ultimatum, writing, &#8220;We will not remove the campaign. Kickstarter can kick rocks and boot us.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>He questioned why the platform had both allowed the project to get through its pre-review process and highlighted it as a &#8220;Project We Love&#8221;, before going on to blame unspecified critics of AI art and blockchain technology for the situation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>He wrote, &#8220;A very vocal angry mob doesn\u2019t want Wonders to exist.&nbsp; Primarily because of AI-assisted art and secondarily that they believe these are just game pieces and should be reprinted into oblivion. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;We don\u2019t have to guess at this, they have made it quite public. You all have likely seen them. We have seen similar mobs bring many big companies to their knees. This is nothing new.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>He also pointed out that Kickstarter&#8217;s rules do not specifically prohibit NFTs, although a Kickstarter spokesperson has confirmed to BoardGameWire that NFTs are not allowed on the platform.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That spokesperson told BoardGameWire that the decision has &#8220;nothing to do with AI&#8221;, which it says was properly disclosed and consistent with its AI policy, adding &#8220;Our action is based on the inclusion of NFTs as a reward&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They said that Kickstarter reviews all projects before they go live, but given the large volumes of submissions and the emerging nature of campaigns, the review process is an ongoing one, adding that in the case of Wonders of the First, &#8220;continued monitoring and review processes later identified a violation&#8221;. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The spokesperson said, &#8220;We take these subsequent reviews seriously to ensure all projects comply with our guidelines. It\u2019s a reflection of our commitment to maintaining the integrity of our platform.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>French had also complained that &#8220;other TCGs with various blockchain components have been funded on KS&#8221; &#8211; although these all appear to be from before 2022, when Kickstarter ended a disastrous attempt to pivot to integrating blockchain technology into its service.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A blog post from the crowdfunding platform in February of that year said it understood concerns about blockchain technology, specifically the &#8220;environmental issues, scams, speculation, and risks&#8221;, and Kate Bernyk, Kickstarter\u2019s then senior director of communications, told Dicebreaker it had &#8220;no plans to allow NFTs on the platform at this time&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link has-black-color has-text-color has-background wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/buttondown.com\/boardgamewire\" style=\"background-color:#f6bf00\">For more stories like this direct to your email inbox, click here to sign up for BoardGameWire&#8217;s free email newsletter. \n\nAnd if you&#8217;ve found our reporting interesting or useful, please consider a paid subscription to help support our journalism!<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Wonders of the First, a contentious collectible card game project which has raised more than $1.4m since launching on Kickstarter last week, has been told by the crowdfunding platform to pull the campaign for its inclusion of cards which can be redeemed for NFTs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2070,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[774,917,209,916,914],"class_list":["post-2069","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-ai-art","tag-blokpax","tag-cancel","tag-jeff-french","tag-wonders-of-the-first"],"blocksy_meta":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/boardgamewire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2069","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/boardgamewire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/boardgamewire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/boardgamewire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/boardgamewire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2069"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/boardgamewire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2069\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2075,"href":"https:\/\/boardgamewire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2069\/revisions\/2075"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/boardgamewire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2070"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/boardgamewire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2069"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/boardgamewire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2069"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/boardgamewire.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2069"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}